Friday, February 28, 2014

Artist Lecture: Ann Weber : Craft, Art and Life 1980-2014

Lecture at Sacramento State University on February 27, 2014



Ann Weber, the artist whose lecture I attended, is interested in creating larger-than-life abstract forms that she constructs from cardboard strips using a stapler.  She was inspired by Viola Fray so she went to the school that she was teaching at at the time.  She started attending art school in 1970.  She was interested at that time in making and selling functional pottery, or production wear.  

In 1985 she came to California where all the interesting pottery was being made.  It was the end of an era- people were making unique work to exhibit in galleries, instead of just functional objects.  She did not know where to start with this whole idea of creative pottery, so she would make production wear like plates and bowls, and she squished them to make something abstract but interesting to the eye.  She used red, white and black to paint them because those colors had meaning and were powerful.  She looked at other work and suddenly had a breakthrough.  



One of her philosophies that she acquired from Viola was "Save the best part of yourself for making your own work."  Another quote that she lives by from Viola is, "You're a beginning artist the first ten years out of school."  This is very true, and I have a feeling I will start living by these words of wisdom as well.

She began with her mentor Viola's process.  She would sculpt, then draw what she sculpted, and by then it had changed 15 percent.  

She wanted work that was easisly transportable and non-fragile, so she started using cardboard instead of plaster.  She would make drawings instead of creating, that way she would take up less space.  She cast some of them in bronze (after soaking in wax) to make them harder and stronger.  The cardboard being bare and naked before though was more pleasing to her.  So she went away with this bronze and wax process.  (She would only bronze them or construct them out of steel if it was a permanent installation in a gallery or somewhere it needed to last forever).  See one of her steel works below:



Her studio burned down eventually, and she lost ten years of her work.  She tells us that the art profession is full of disappointment and work, and a lot of money.  I know already, and I am only 23, that she is NOT joking.  

She went on to tell us about some individual pieces and what they meant to her and where her inspiration came from.  One piece, called "Enough is Not Enough" (left), was influenced by the Maidu tribe's baskets (I learned about them in my Native American Art class and they make very tiny to very large baskets with their bare hands and natural tools from their land).  It really is quite amazing, I have seen them in the Downtown Sacramento Native American Art Museum.











Another piece that quite inspired me, because of the idea process more than anything, is "Marie Antoinette" (right).  She could not find any blank, white cardboard boxes to cut up, so she was forced to use color.  This was her introduction to a new world and would use color from now on.  She found a large mushroom outside one day that blew her mind because of its size.  She started to make a replica of it, and it turned out to look more like a woman, or Marie Antoinette, in her eyes.










I really loved her idea of how she made "Float and Sting" (left).  This piece functioned off the idea of floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee, but to me they actually resemble bees fluttering around the beehive.

She had traveled to Rome and picked up influence and inspiration there from a little romance there, as well as the infinite amount of sculpture that covered every inch of everywhere she went.  She used Rome as her muse, and she is still creating work inspired by their sculpture, such as the angel wings and the beautiful drapery she saw on several statues.  








In this image (right) you can see how she likes to mimic shapes that inspire her.  She told us that you can find inspiration anywhere, that our lives are so full of the most valuable precious meanings that we can never possibly be lacking of inspiration- it is just a matter of looking closely at your life and what is around you.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Art 21 Segment: Rackstraw Downes

Wow.  This man seems crazy when you first listen to and look at him.  But when you look at his paintings- it is like looking at photographs.  He is more interesting than other artists because he looks for deserted places and huge empty spaces that live lightly on the earth.  He makes drawings and then paints.  The paintings are unusual and fascinating because he looks in front of him, and paints in the middle of the canvas.  Then he looks to the right, and paints on the right side.  Same on the left, then he completely turns around 180 degrees, and keeps painting on the sides of the canvas, so that the perspective shows you a panoramic view and the center is largest, or seemingly closest.  It is hard to describe this type of work but he is just in one word- incredible.  Here is just one of his incredible paintings to show you.

He says he is not a landscape artist but paints his environment, his surroundings.  This way, in Downes' words, "It gives you the idea that it is a physical thing that surrounds you and immediately takes you away from the flat-plane image of the world.  'Surroundings' implies that the landscape does really curve around you." (Segment: Rackstraw Downes in "Balance", 8 minutes, 44 seconds in/ 54:28)



Campus Library Exhibition

The Land The People: Contemporary Korean Prints
University Library Gallery, California State University, Sacramento
February 6 – May 17, 2014
Historical background is the theme of the exhibited works.  The imagery screams Korean culture.  The show has portraits, animation-type imagery, and there was much imagery of scenery and industrial landscape, even abstraction.  
My fascination is mostly in the linocut works I saw.  A portrait I fell madly in love with titled “The Testimony No. 1, 2001” by Jung Won Chul stopped me in my tracks.  I never realized the amount of detail that can be achieved through carving linoleum.  The most stunning part of this work was that at first glance across the room, it looks like a photograph.  When you stand closer, it looks like a painting.  Even closer, and it looks like a drawing (which technically is closest to what it is).  



I was also amazed with what Koo Harvey, a curator of the show, had told me.  She had described to me the process of pressing patterns into paper using weight, so that the layers of paper underneath would be texturized.  The closer you stand to these images, the more and more seemingly infinite the detail is.  
This show really made me feel like I was looking into Ian and Koo Harvey’s interest and culture and even their inspiration of their collaborative work, probably.  I thought it was very interesting feeling like I was in Korea standing in an art museum or gallery quietly keeping to myself and doing silent critiques.  I came up with so many new inspirations and ideas for my own work just looking at these!


I can really begin to appreciate art from different parts of the world, and I did not realize just how much coming from a different culture can affect types of artwork produced.  I love seeing the different landscapes and faces and ideas that come from Korea, and it makes me want to look at more diverse populations of art.  I have been so subjected to just American art and abstraction and realism, that I have been restricted.  
This show made me realize how much is out there and how much I can learn from other people and how their patience in creating work may enhance mine, or even how aggressive some artists are with their work may help me let loose with mine.  I mostly love how connected these artists were to the material they were using, and I speak mostly to that pressed paper when I say this.  I always work from already processed materials and I just add paint.  These artists really go in deep and are harmonious in ways with building and using their materials.  I have really begun to open up my eyes thanks to this show, so conveniently located on campus.

Art 21 Segment: Robert Mangold

Robert Mangold in “Balance”
Art 21 Segment
Painting, Sculpture. Interest in culture rather than the nature around him that he depicts or tries to represent. Circular images with negative space in the center, and the circles themselves have squares formed from geometric lines and swirled lines going either horizontally or vertically.  His work is so simplistic that you almost think to yourself at first glance, “I could do this in my sleep.  Why is he so successful?”  Well, the first obvious answer is, I could do it, but I didn’t.  He did.  The second reason is that there is much more behind it.  He has notebooks filled with sketched ideas and blueprints of these magnificent circles before he creates them.  
He starts with an idea, then sketches it quickly.  After the quick sketches, sort of like thumbnails, he chooses his favorite, or several favorites.  He makes a larger scale drawing of the favorite thumbnail(s), and keeps adding to the image, whether it be just a line or an internal circle or filling a shape in with white chalk.  Then he hangs it on the wall ruling out more aspects that he likes and dislikes, critiquing himself.  Once he finishes that, he makes a three-dimensional sculpture out of wood and paints over it, and draws on it mimicking what was in the thumbnail.  The best part of this process is after he finishes, he hangs them up a certain way to where the light hits it best at a certain time of day and on what wall he thinks will look best.


Mangold basically makes me look like a very lazy artist who just spontaneously creates work and does not make nearly as many decisions about hanging them up or showing them.  Most of my work I just pile up and leave in a corner.  But what we do have in common is the decisions we make during the process of creating the artwork.  I, like Mangold, sit and observe many times before my brush even touches the canvas again.  
He likes to create shapes that reflect what he sees in nature.  He likes to think about how buildings in his environment take up so much space, but also are a huge amount of space themselves.  This gives him the idea of negative space.  He takes the focal point of the work and completely removes it, so that we are forced to look at other aspects that are obviously more important to him, so should be to us.  

The fact that his works are mostly broken circles make your eye travel around, but also stop at the breaking point and think.  We think about why these pieces are so intentionally simple, and why the circle itself, usually just one solid color, is in fact so important.  We wonder also what would have been in that center that is removed, because since it is there it makes you want to know more.  It is almost like he is creating a puzzle that is missing a key piece, yet all the pieces are there and it is up to us to find it.

Art 21 Segment: Raymond Pettibon

Raymond Pettibon in “Humor”
Art 21 Segment
Raymond Pettibon may just be one of the most interesting artists I have become aware of.  In good ways he is funny, because it engages the viewer.  In bad ways, he seems a little unorganized and just thoughtlessly creates work whether people find it funny or not.
Pettibon likes to take humor and create images to express himself.  He does not feel the need to be serious but does not want to offend or hurt anyone.  He uses humor and making people laugh to get and keep them interested.  He creates simple imagery that you are confused about at first, and then your eye wanders looking for a deeper meaning and you find text.  Sometimes he has a sentence or two, sometimes only a word.  These texts, being a single word or a phrase, enlighten us completely about what we are looking at.  I find it fascinating that he keeps such a messy studio where he can barely walk around, and he finds that to meet his standards of “organized”.  This plays into his artwork to me.  


I see his artwork as untidy, unorganized, yet intentional and very thought-out.  He is interesting to me because his work has more of a comical aspect on it, and by that I mean his work reminds me of comic strips in a newspaper, or even a funny little e-card that you find on the internet.  He does not need a perfect image to get him going, nor even a steady idea.  He can just create!  That is so marvelous to me.  I usually need a reference photo or something physically in front of me to get my thoughts and paint going.  Raymond Pettibon just makes everything up as he goes along.  We are different types of artists in that I am more of a realist and he is more cartoon-oriented, so I did not really respect him at first.  But after looking at his collection for a while I realized that he probably could do everything that I can, but he does not show it off because he is interested in something deeper.  This gives me ideas about how I can start trying to make my work meaningful and connecting with my audience, or even just expressing myself better.


Pettibon says that he creates work looking to give people either a short, quick laugh, or to make them feel a certain way.  To me, it is his way of expressing his opinion and how he feels about certain things.  I say this because looking through his work I personally felt like I was bantering with the artist about funny or not-so-funny things.  This created a relationship between me, the art, and the artist.  That is a very powerful tool that no one else I have critiqued, viewed, or met has pulled off.